This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of use.

GTX1070Ti

When Nvidia launched the GTX 1070 and 1080 back in May 2016, information technology decisively re-established itself every bit the upper-midrange market, while extending its pb at the top of the graphics stack. Save for the launch of the new 1080 Ti and a minor crash-land to the GTX 1080'south RAM clocks before this year, that's where the market stayed until August, when AMD's Vega 56 took a modest lead over the 1070 and Vega 64 landed just below the 1080 (albeit at much higher power). Nvidia apparently wants to close the gap betwixt itself and AMD at the GTX 1070's price point, and the new GTX 1070 Ti is designed to do just that.

AMD-vs-NV-Chart

The 1070 Ti is a neat dissever between the GTX 1080 and the GTX 1070. Make full rates on the 1070 and 1070 Ti tin actually exceed the 1080 (depending on your carte du jour's maximum frequency), since some 1070 and 1070 Ti cards actually clock higher than the 1080. All three cards have 64 ROPS, simply the 1080 does maintain a noted retentiveness bandwidth advantage. At the same time, the bear on of this on games is smaller than you might await, since Pascal GPUs are historically pretty memory efficient. GDDR5X is only used on the 1080 and 1080 Ti; the 1070 and 1070 Ti still use normal GDDR5. Pricing, again, splits the departure between the 1070 and 1080.

We've rounded up reviews from Anandtech, Computer Shopper, PCGamer, and Tech Report. Here'due south how they suspension down: There's general agreement, on all sides, that this new GPU closes the gap betwixt the GTX 1070 and the Vega 56, though obviously this is still somewhat game-dependent. At that place are games where the 1070 Ti pulls alee significantly and games where Vega 56 still leads by a narrow margin.

This brings up a point we desire to accost in a bit more than item. Information technology is not unusual for GPU reviews to vary between websites depending on a variety of factors, including testbed configurations, the specific games tested, which API the tests are run in, and the detail levels within the games themselves. With that said, the gap between Vega 56 and the 1070 Ti is much wider in some reviews than others. Reckoner Shopper shows the GTX 1070 Ti and the GTX 1070 beating Vega 56 in almost every examination. Anandtech reports that Vega 56 is ~8 percent faster than the GTX 1070, but that AMD's lower-terminate Vega is edged out by roughly five percent by the 1070 Ti. PCGamer's results (you can see the amass graph below) are between Anandtech and CS, with Vega 56 slightly behind the GTX 1070 and the GTX 1070 Ti well alee.

GTX1070Ti-PCG

Image by PCGamer

Tech Report has published a sneak peak of both its 99th-percentile scatter plot and its average fps/$. We've gone with the scatterplot to offering a different operation perspective (click through to see the average fps results), but TR's results look a bit more similar Anandtech's in both cases. Again, the Vega 56 is well ahead of the GTX 1070, simply the GTX 1070 Ti is ahead of Vega 56.

I don't bring up these differences to throw shade on whatsoever of the sites in question–if I thought they were producing bad data, I wouldn't include them hither–merely equally a pertinent example of how GPU comparisons can change depending on which tests you use. Testbed configuration is normally a relatively small variable, provided zero is egregiously misconfigured, but item settings tin can shift game results fairly significantly, fifty-fifty without enabling optimizations like GameWorks that are specifically tuned to run well on Nvidia GPUs. AMD maintains an overall compute workload advantage in OpenCL 2.0 (according to Anandtech), simply other tests, like Folding, still favor Nvidia GPUs.

The GTX family continues to win on ability consumption as well, though how much this matters varies past the gamer and past the base cooler on the GPU. Desktop owners tend to treat ability consumption equally a proxy for both dissonance and oestrus (which is a pretty reasonable fashion to treat it, in my opinion), but while Vega never hits the 95C temperatures that Hawaii was known for, its coolers still tend to be louder than their Nvidia counterparts (third-party cards based on Vega are few and far between thus far).

The major practical factor is going to come up downwardly to price. Cryptocurrency mining has driven the price of GPUs upwards dramatically, and AMD cards have been hit harder by this than their Nvidia equivalents. Correct now, Vega 56 and 64 availability actually looks pretty adept, but this can change depending on how the cryptocurrency market shifts from calendar week to week. And of course nosotros aren't seeing many ODM cards in market yet that aren't based on AMD's own reference design, so that could play a gene in selection as well.

The lesser line is this: Vega 56 remains a good counter to the GTX 1070, the GTX 1070 Ti now offers a small reward for another $70 compared with the GTX 1070'southward MSRP, and Vega 64 nonetheless isn't a great match-up against the GTX 1080. If you're already running a Pascal GPU, the 1070 Ti probably isn't worth the upgrade, but gamers back on the 9xx or earlier cards would notice a dramatic performance comeback.